Did She or Didn't She? Does it Matter?
I'm really astonished that there's this much focus on Sarah Jessica Parker's rumored (or has it been confirmed?) mole removal. If she had it removed (and I hope she did), good for her. It was distracting, seemed large enough to be dangerous (if not painful) and at the end of the day - it is her face to do with as she wishes.
Thankfully, most of us won't face the paparazzi and thousands of fans at Yankee Stadium to notice subtle changes in our appearance. Even so, it is SJP's visage, and she should be free to do with it as she feels comfortable. For all we know, she was advised to have it removed for medial reasons. It seems unlikely that an actress this deep in her career would opt to change such an iconic feature of her appearance if it weren't deemed necessary (think Lauren Hutton's iconic tooth gap). Fans and casual observers shouldn't have the right to criticize Sarah for removing what may have been bothering her for a number for reasons.
I'm glad to see that Plastic Surgeon Tony Youn agrees:
Moles are rarely cancerous...However, if you have any concern about a mole, have your dermatologist or plastic surgeon take a peek at it. This would be bigger news if it was Cindy Crawford's signature mole.
If you are interested in plastic surgery visit www.rpsplasticsurgery.com for more information. Some of our most popular procedures include breast augmentation, breast reduction, breast lift, liposuction, tummy tuck, rhinoplasty and facelift surgery.

Comments